{"id":8764,"date":"2022-08-11T02:22:39","date_gmt":"2022-08-11T02:22:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ultimatehealthreport.com\/endogenous-dmt-a-scientific-mystery\/"},"modified":"2022-08-11T02:22:39","modified_gmt":"2022-08-11T02:22:39","slug":"endogenous-dmt-a-scientific-mystery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ultimatehealthreport.com\/endogenous-dmt-a-scientific-mystery\/","title":{"rendered":"Endogenous DMT: A Scientific Mystery"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

Here\u2019s an intriguing question: Why do our bodies, and those of other mammals, produce N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT<\/span>), a potent psychedelic also found throughout the plant kingdom? The answer, perhaps disappointingly, is that we still don\u2019t know. According to the authors of a new review in the Journal of Psychopharmacology<\/em>,1<\/sup>DMT<\/span>\u2019s raison d\u2019etre<\/em> \u2013 indeed whether or not it\u2019s relevant to mammalian physiology at all \u2013 is the subject of a 60-year debate that remains unsettled to this day.<\/p>\n

Instead of rehashing the entire history, which the review authors assert began in 1961 with a claim in the journal Science<\/em> that endogenous DMT<\/span> could underlie mental illness,2<\/sup> let\u2019s jump to 2001. When Rick Strassman\u2019s landmark book DMT<\/span>: The Spirit Molecule<\/em> was published that year, DMT<\/span> was still a niche subject in a niche field. In 2001, only six papers across the entire body of peer-reviewed scientific literature so much as mentioned the compound \u2013 five of which, including one coauthored by Strassman,3<\/sup> were concerned with research methods and pharmacology. (The sixth was an early and now widely cited study out of Europe on the subjective effects of the psychedelic brew ayahuasca, which contains DMT<\/span>.4<\/sup>)<\/p>\n